PDA

View Full Version : Tri-Quality Training: Three Ways To Move Big Weights



Charles Staley
12-15-2009, 12:16 PM
If I were to isolate three motor qualities that nearly everyone could use more of, they’d be:

A) Power (Speed-Strength)
B) Maximal Strength
C) Strength-Endurance

The rationale for my short list is perhaps obvious- in addition to greater strength, power, and endurance, the pursuit of these qualities leads to greater body composition and real-world athletic functionality. I might also add (as I approach my 50th birthday) that these three qualities are the first to recede with age, particularly if you’re sedentary.

Conveniently, these three qualities correspond with the three competitive strength disciplines: Olympic-style weightlifting, powerlifting, and strongman. As it so happens, weightlifting drills are the most appropriate ways to express athletic power, while the three powerlifts lend themselves to the expression of maximal strength, and the various strongman events are great ways to train and test strength-endurance.

A simple way to implement all three of these qualities/disciplines is to initiate each workout with an Olympic lift (or variant), continue with a powerlift (or variant) and commence with a strongman event (or variant).

Training Frequency

Further, in keeping with the “three” theme, I’ll suggest training three days a week, which, by the way, is how many of the most accomplished strength and power athletes have trained throughout history.

Tight Random Spray

Finally, in an attempt to strike an optimal balance between specificity and variety, we’ll employ a “randomized tight spray” in selecting our daily exercise menus: you’ll pre-identify 6 different exercises for each quality-discipline, and then roll a dye to select each day’s three exercises. Here are sample lists for each quality, but please make these lists your own by customizing them to your own requirements- for example, if you’re experienced in full cleans or snatches, by all means, use them. Or if you can’t/won’t shouldn’t back squat but can/should front squat, plus that in to the maximal strength exercise menu in place of the back squat

Sample Exercise Lists

Olympic-lift Variants

1) Power Snatch
2) Power Clean
3) Power Clean & Jerk
4) Clean Pull
5) Snatch Pull
6) Power Clean & Press

Powerlift Variants

1) Back Squat
2) Deadlift
3) Bench Press
4) Rack Pull
5) Floor Press
6) Box Squat

Strongman Variants

1) Tire Flip
2) Vehicle Pull
3) Farmer’s Walk
4) Log Clean & Press
5) Repetition Deadlift
6) Overhead Barbell Walk

Assigning Loading Parameters

Loading parameters will be determined at least in part by the exercises themselves: Olympic and powerlifting drills should be done in multiple (5-10) sets of low (1-3) reps. The strongman events are a different beast: typically, these are done for time and/or speed, attempting to complete as many reps (or as much distance) as possible within a pre-determined time frame. One way to address this variable is to use a rotating set/rep format, where each week within a four-week cycle calls for a different pattern. For example:

Week One: 5×2
Week Two: 10×1
Week Three: 3×3
Week Four: 6×4

Then for the strongman day, you can set up a similar scenario, where time-frames and/or distance vary week by week. Here’s an example using the farmer’s walk:

Week One: 3 walks, 60 seconds each walk
Week Two: 3 walks, 90 seconds each walk
Week Three: 4 walks, 30 seconds each walk
Week Four: Maximum distance at a given weight

Mesocyclic Planning

Using a system such as the one I suggested above, I’d suggest that the first month be used to establish baseline performances for each drill. Then, in month two, seek to break your PR’s in each exercise/loading arrangement. After three months of this, change up your exercise lists and loading arrangements, and start fresh. Using this system, you’ll enjoy many months of specific, yet variable training that will make you bigger, faster, and stronger than you ever thought possible.

brittf
12-15-2009, 01:00 PM
Hi Charles.

Nice post. Since this is the 4th message I have typed to you in the past 30 minutes, I can only assume that I am trying to avoid my real work (grading 260 final exams for MBA students, each 18 pages long)...

This program would seem directed to the intermediate lifter (or advanced) moreso than Mark's typical novice trainee. At the novice level, I would suspect that frequent practice of the same basic movements is important. Plus, you don't want to miss the fast strength gains possible from a simple linear progression.

It fits me to a "T" since I have long ago exhausted any linear gains :).

I will give it a go and see what happens...

Regards,
brittf

Sgsolberg
12-15-2009, 01:10 PM
I hope this doesn’t offend you, but this reminds me quite a bit of what crossfit should have been (but with strongman events subbed for gymnastics). It looks like it would provide a good bit of GPP, while maintaining core lift competency and building strength.

After the recent fallout in the CF community I have been reflecting on what I see as legitimate criticism of their program and out of curiosity was looking for something more along these lines.

What sort of a metcon would you combine with this? I know that the oly lifts are fairly metcon intense when done for multiple sets, so would you recommend Long Slow Distance or would you be more inclined towards 3-5 400m sprints once every week or two?

Additionally, this is obviously not appropriate for novice lifters whose strength base and technique are insufficient. At what point in an intermediate lifter’s training would this sort of programming be appropriate?

Charles Staley
12-15-2009, 02:56 PM
In fact, quite the contrary- it compliments me. Thank you and I agree

[QUOTE=Sgsolberg;84721]I hope this doesn’t offend you, but this reminds me quite a bit of what crossfit should have been (but with strongman events subbed for gymnastics).

Sgsolberg
12-15-2009, 03:42 PM
What sort of a metcon would you combine with this? I know that the oly lifts are fairly metcon intense when done for multiple sets, so would you recommend Long Slow Distance or would you be more inclined towards 3-5 400m sprints once every week or two?

Additionally, this is obviously not appropriate for novice lifters whose strength base and technique are insufficient. At what point in an intermediate lifter’s training would this sort of programming be appropriate?

brittf
12-15-2009, 03:50 PM
What sort of a metcon would you combine with this? I know that the oly lifts are fairly metcon intense when done for multiple sets, so would you recommend Long Slow Distance or would you be more inclined towards 3-5 400m sprints once every week or two?


I am curious as to Charles' answer to this. I suspect I know the answer, since I have read most of his material (hint - he HATES LSD training :)) but it will be interesting to hear his exact response...

Good argument about CrossFit as well. I have followed pretty much the same track as you are describing. As a former USMC infantry officer (and now, of all things, a business-school professor :)), I appreciate the metcon/strength-endurance aspect of CrossFit. However, for my purposes, it is TOO varied without enough consistency in specific lifts to get very good. I am also not a big fan of high-rep, light Olympic lifts...

Regards,
brittf

Charles Staley
12-15-2009, 04:20 PM
I think the only way you can address this would be against the context of a needs analysis—if you're a strength/power athlete, don't do "metcon" at all. If you need anaerobic endurance (the type needed by 90% of athletes who need endurance at all), you should be using anaerobic intervals. This can be done via barbells ("bardio"), strongman implements, track work, etc., etc.

With all that said, I wouldn't assume that metcons should be done by default- they should be done if you need endurance.


What sort of a metcon would you combine with this? I know that the oly lifts are fairly metcon intense when done for multiple sets, so would you recommend Long Slow Distance or would you be more inclined towards 3-5 400m sprints once every week or two?

Additionally, this is obviously not appropriate for novice lifters whose strength base and technique are insufficient. At what point in an intermediate lifter’s training would this sort of programming be appropriate?